Skip to main content
Topic: Thoughts on media embedding? (Read 15201 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #15

Glad you like that idea since
QuoteWhat it does:
After the page loads it searches the msg_ divs for links, and for links that it recognizes and can parse (youtube, vimeo) it gets the video thumbnail and inserts that in the page in place of the link.  Clicking on the image will cause it to embed the video in the page.  Doing it this way is a little less overhead then embedding it from the start.
Thats what you have ;)

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #16

 emanuele has seen a branch merged a few moments ago

 emanuele thinks this is done now, right? O:-)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #17

Its done!  :D ... (although I have a quick update in a fixin branch (off is on and on is off with the ACP)

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #18

lol

But that's a bug! :P
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #19

Hi, I don't think my question warrant a new topic. :)

Is the normal behaviour of media embedding is not enabled if inserted in quote?

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #20

Yes,

Links inside of quotes are not rendered.   That same is true for links in signatures.

If you wanted to change that you would have to edit the elk_jquery_embed.js, look for // Ignore in quotes and signatures in that file ;)

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #21

Thanks! Nah... not gonna enable it, I can see why it disabled. :) Just curious is it the intended behaviour.
192.MY.ID: Forum ISP Indonesia.

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #22

Great feature. Many will love this.

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #23

How about embedding arbitrary streamable http links?

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #24

I'm not sure it would be easy to automatically detect arbitrary streamable urls.
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #25

Well, that would mean that they should be supplied with a BBC tag. Possibly separate video and audio tags.

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #26

Quote from: derived – 500 megs cost me $6 when i am out of bandwidth
i don't know how to browser blocks sites, but i am going to find out
I'd use a bandwidth limiter app or something like that.
~ SimplePortal Support Team ~

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #27

Video/audio embedding doesn't necessarily mean auto-play. ;)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #28

Facebook is doing auto play. Hate it.

Re: Thoughts on media embedding?

Reply #29

Note that I never meant for auto play to happen for any video I embed. Just an option of playing it, for when the browser a user is viewing the page with will simply force them to pre-download the entire video and play it locally.