Re: Trivial questions
Reply #15 –
Old bump ... again feedback,
This may have been a mistake to remove. Not that I want to over option us, but seems a lot of folks like to use this way of browsing. The reasoning is you hit "new" read "up" and then the menu is there to return to "new posts"
Without it its hit "new" read "down" hit the bottom, scroll/nav back to the top to find the menu to return to "new posts" or whatever.
So basically if you are a new post or new reply's user, the lower linktree does not have a way to return you to what you were doing, so you have to do a nav top to continue, which from a usability perspective is not optimal if thats they way you work.
Re: Trivial questions
Reply #16 –
Interesting way of browsing, it certainly is optimized.
Counter proposal: what if we change the lower linktree in a form that "remembers" (browsing history tree?) the latest... 4 pages visited?
Re: Trivial questions
Reply #17 –
nods thought about that as well, just add simple "back" buttons to the bottom linktree or other ... Then looked at the bottom and (on this post) I have 20 buttons to click and one pull down (after the bottom post before QR) , do I really want to add more?
Re: Trivial questions
Reply #18 –
LOL
The fact some of the buttons should GT*O is an absolute truth, anyway I was more thinking to replace entirely the "below" linktree with that other thing rather than add another button.
Re: Trivial questions
Reply #21 –
I'd rather have a linktree than a breadcrumb trail. I can always hit the back button.