Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: Editor bug or quick reply bug? (Read 7278 times) previous topic - next topic - Topic derived from Re: Bug with smiley and impli...
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Editor bug or quick reply bug?

See http://www.elkarte.net/index.php?topic=340.msg2163#msg2163 for the bug description


Posting from quick reply with editor disabled

From: http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=502928.msg3537332#msg3537332

Code: [Select]
:)  O:) >:D
:)  O:) >:D              works here

Code: [Select]
[*]:)  O:) >:D
  • :)  O:) >:D         works here (as orphan list bullet)
Code: [Select]
[list]
[*]:)  O:) >:D
[/list]
  • :)  O:) >:D         fails here  (smileys not expanded) (but WERE in the code section!)

Code: [Select]
[list]
[li]:)  O:) >:D[/li]
[/list]
    • :)  O:) >:D
        works here, BUT end-list tag not recognized

Are these cases covered by the known bug?
Last Edit: May 02, 2013, 12:43:34 pm by emanuele
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick relreply bug?

Reply #1 –

Preview from quick reply with editor disabled

From: http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=502928.msg3537332#msg3537332

Code: [Select]
  O:) >:D
:)  O:) >:D              works here

Code: [Select]
[*]:)  O:) >:D
  • :)  O:) >:D         works here (as orphan list bullet)
Code: [Select]
[list]
[*]:)  O:) >:D
[/list]
  • :)  O:) >:D         fails here  (smileys not expanded) (but WERE in the code section!)

Code: [Select]
[list]
[li]:)  O:) >:D[/li]
[/list]

Are these cases covered by the known bug?[/li][/list]
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick relreply bug?

Reply #2 –

Code: [Select]
:)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick relreply bug?

Reply #3 –

Code: [Select]
:) :D O:-)
  • 123
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick relreply bug?

Reply #4 –

Code: [Select]
:) :D O:-)
  • 123
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick reply bug?

Reply #5 –

Code: [Select]
:)  O:) >:D
:)  O:) >:D              works here

Code: [Select]
[*]:)  O:) >:D
  • :)  O:) >:D         works here (as orphan list bullet)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick reply bug?

Reply #6 –

Code: [Select]
  O:) >:D
:)  O:) >:D              works here

Code: [Select]
[*]:)  O:) >:D
  • :)  O:) >:D         works here (as orphan list bullet)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick reply bug?

Reply #7 –

Code: [Select]
  O:) >:D
:)  O:) >:D              works here

Code: [Select]
[*]:)  O:) >:D
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick reply bug?

Reply #8 –

Code: [Select]
  O:) >:D
:)  O:) >:D              works here
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick reply bug?

Reply #9 –

Code: [Select]
  O:) >:D
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick reply bug?

Reply #10 –

Code: [Select]
  O:)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick reply bug?

Reply #11 –

In the quick reply write:
[code]:) [/code]
Then click preview.
The smiley is stripper and since the code block is empty it is stripped too.
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Editor bug or quick reply bug?

Reply #12 –

No, it's a bug of the editor: it's enough to write:
[code]:) [/code]
and toggle on and off again the WYSIWYG, the result is that the smiley is stripped (when turning the editor "off"), but the bug is probably before, when the smiley is converted to the actual image with toggling the WYSIWYG on.
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.
 

Re: Editor bug or quick reply bug?

Reply #13 –

Looks fixed in the latest trunk
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.