Re: Arrrrggggggggghhhhhh! Max-width is actual 150em?
Reply #3 –
LOL ... I'll change it, actually is it needed at all, would that not be the default behavior?
Re: Arrrrggggggggghhhhhh! Max-width is actual 150em?
Reply #4 –
No, it wouldn't be. If your width setting is actual width, that is a fixed amount. If you changed the forum width setting to be max-width instead, that would handle it automatically (it would just go straight to full width on a narrower device).
But there's something to be said for having the max-width in the CSS, because it allows you set to something like max-width: 98%; if you want to keep a narrow margin on tablet/portrait or whatever, then going to 100% on a phone.
Re: Arrrrggggggggghhhhhh! Max-width is actual 150em?
Reply #5 –
Understood ... The old comment on that 150em (which was 100em at one point back in 1.0) is
/* Next limits maximum width on wide screens.
Sized in em, since some people require larger text.
For ease of reading, content really should not be too wide. */
Just posting that for some historical context.