Re: Consistency of naming, admin
Reply #5 –
I like BoardsManage better too. Easier to find file names in a quick glance as pointed out. And even allows you to key stroke to find it a little better. No problems renaming templates to match IMO.
Re: Consistency of naming, admin
Reply #7 –
Meh... yeah the more I think about it I do like BoardsAdmin better. It makes more sense and lets the user know it's a file that deals with administration.
Re: Consistency of naming, admin
Reply #8 –
admin.boards.controller.php ?
Re: Consistency of naming, admin
Reply #12 –
To explain this last bit. This used to be the case because these are only admin sections, they don't have a "user" counter-part, they're not pages to manage something which is also available to users actions. They're just some pages available only in admin. They're not "all with Admin or Manage", but the idea behind them is like: admin pages which manage something which users act upon (i.e. Posts), are named ManagePosts, those which handle stuff admin-only, Packages, are Packages.
In this branch, I kept this idea, and expanded upon it. I've simplified a few other names: "ManageCoreFeatures" becomes simpler, "CoreFeatures". Well, it's two-words (apart from "_controller"), it ain't three. And Core Features is the core features area, no other like it in the UI. Same for a few others. ManageMaintenance -> Maintenance etc. (For templates and if any, language too.)
=> This branch won't solve the keyboard issue (sawwrry!), and it won't prettify them, but it will simplify them where possible. The main points of this approach are simplicity and minimum changes.
I'll note, I'm torn on the "Manage"/"Admin" missing. But also since they're in /admin, to have them all (33 files of 35) with Manage/Admin is also slightly redundant. I'll try to look at it from more perspectives.
Anyway. Please note a last bit, I'd prefer to "freeze" them, that is, the PR I'll make is meant to solve this topic without WIPs. So consider it this way: one of these is what we'll work with in 1.0 and 2.0 major versions.
Re: Consistency of naming, admin
Reply #14 –
I suppose for 1.x line we have to keep naming stable, so unless there are big issues we can consider this close, right?