I never understood why BBC has to be like that:
[b][i]text[/i][/b]
...and can't be like that:
[b][i]text[/b][i][i][/i]
Can't the editor (or what's so ever is responsible for this) look for the ending code, wherever it stands? I as human can think like this:
"Oh, there's a [b], let's keep this in mind. Oh, there's a [i] know, let's keep this in mind too. Oh, now [b] is closed with an [/b], but [i] is still open, so the text should now be only italic. Oh, there's the [/i], back to normal text now."
Can't the editor?
Would be much easier for users working with BBC if there could be more flexibility. O:-) [/b][/i]
Wahhhh!! What happened!?!? :o My edit has corrupted my post! :o >:(
Click on edit of my post please, it's funny! Most of the text shown above is missing then. Grrrr!
Looks like SCEditor doesn't like that much unmatched codes. :-\
Use the quick edit for the moment. I can't guess right now if the problem is due to a bug in the editor or a problem with some code we added.
This was already present before BBC Parsing. This happens from time to time even in SMF 2.0.11. I think that this is due to Firefox.
I didn't wrote any unmatched BBCode outside the code block. I don't know why the editor has problems with my post and inserted the lot of [i] in my code block. :o Before my edit my post was okay, after that it wasn't. :o I thought all inside the code block will not be interpreted?
I don't have a quick edit button here. I only can click "more" "modify". :(
I used IE for this post. ;)
With Internet Explorer I'm hardly walk. Firefox is just a guess on my part.
Reported at:
https://github.com/samclarke/SCEditor/issues/493
Looks like he wasn't happy about the report, it basically fell into the ocean
I can't get it to do it either, so not sure whats up ....
I hope
@Jorin can help then ;)
Do you really want me to try to reproduce it? ;)