Out of curiosity, what browser?
Good catch .. looks that way in pale moon, have not checked others.
The fix seems like a good choice to me as it only targets the top menu which is where the alignment tweak was needed.
Was that one ever fixed?
It seems still a little off, to me. Not as bad as was, though.
More so, when looking at own post, too.
There's a "top: -1px;" in .listlevel1.subsections that causes it. No idea why it's there at all, lol, I fixed it in inspect element by just removing it, and it causes no visual issues with anything else. Still, the OP suggested a good fix for it as well, that should be removing it from just that spot.
Since the -1px was added in 1.0.3, probably for a reason (but unfortunately the reason has been forgot), I now removed it from the site, so please everybody, have a look around maybe with different browser and let me know if is broken. :P
Roger that. Nothing in sight so far.
You have bad sight. :P
So, the problem is that the fix was applied only partially: the main problem was the top menu (see attachment gif), but without the #main_menu the fix breaks the "more" button.
So, the proper fix would be to add the id as well.
I just changed again the css adding #main_menu.
Coolio :) And LOL sorry if I can't see a pixel in a flat background on a css code I've never seen ;D
SeaMonkey :P
That works better than FireFox! :P
Really, I am testing desktop notifications and they work in SM but not in FF! LOL
Glad I ain't the only one --> http://virtualinteractivege.com/index.php?topic=154.0
It probably does work better, especially on XP :P
Yeah and on Windows 98-like themes ;D
/me doesn't use XP on a daily basis since... about 5 years ago! LOL
Same :P
I've had to run it full time over the last couple of weeks (virtual box) as I was lax in keeping one of my cad programs up to date and now refuse to pay 2.5K to "upgrade" :P Thankfully my old version runs great in the vbox !
WOW!
I should have it on my old laptop that I turn on once in a blue moon... actually even less. lol
BTW, I always preferred win 2000. O:-)
Just wondering how the topic derailed from a non-fixed bug to a fixed bug and then to Windows versions... LOL.
Way to derail a derailed topic :P