Re: Word censor: should be thoroughly tested, yes? Reply #30 – March 31, 2014, 03:18:50 pm That means more ways to get lost in admin.
Re: Word censor: should be thoroughly tested, yes? Reply #31 – March 31, 2014, 03:22:52 pm Quote from: emanuele – March 31, 2014, 12:49:52 pmQuote from: Antechinus – March 29, 2014, 10:04:09 pmQuoteThat's not counting that the word censor can be used for non-profane words as well. There are a myriad of situations where an admin might use the word censor to replace words. They may use it to explain acronyms, restrict content or have a low-tech trigger word for certain situations.Ok, now you're making a solid argument.And that makes me think that the two should really be two different functions, working the same way, but two different config pages and two different options. I think.NO.
Re: Word censor: should be thoroughly tested, yes? Reply #32 – March 31, 2014, 03:25:59 pm You could have some way of categorising and ordering items if you wanted to get fancy, but it should all be on the same page IMO.
Re: Word censor: should be thoroughly tested, yes? Reply #34 – March 31, 2014, 04:17:40 pm Put your time into fixing the censor so it copes with the content of BBC tags that use equals stuffz. Quote from: Poo Bum Nya gently caress fudge nuggets fudge nuggets MehSee. It doesn't work on the quote headers.
Re: Word censor: should be thoroughly tested, yes? Reply #35 – March 31, 2014, 04:18:52 pm Oh it does. I must have just used words that Spuds hadn't censored then. Cool. Let's play "Make life difficult for Spuds".
Re: Word censor: should be thoroughly tested, yes? Reply #36 – March 31, 2014, 05:07:50 pm Quote from: Antechinus – March 31, 2014, 04:18:52 pmOh it does. I must have just used words that Spuds hadn't censored then. Cool. Let's play "Make life difficult for Spuds". Wait, we weren't already?!
Re: Word censor: should be thoroughly tested, yes? Reply #37 – March 31, 2014, 05:22:58 pm We can always up our game.
Modern, Free, Powerful