Re: instagram profile field
Reply #1 –
It is better for me if any image links from any website is auto translated to a fixed size framed picture in a post. We already have this right?
Re: instagram profile field
Reply #4 –
I think I know profile field got nothing to do with storing images and istagram is a social site where you store images. Well, other social sites also has that ability too. So having istagram as a profile field is not as important as having image links to display image right away when pasted, in a fixed size and with frame, if possible.
Purpose? Simplify users from having to use bbc img each time they need to show a picture in their post.
Re: instagram profile field
Reply #8 –
Are you sure they are posted? O_o
Really?
Re: instagram profile field
Reply #9 –
Yep. I tested on chrome. This site for 1.1 and my own test site for 1.0. Select copy image, paste it in either quick reply or post page. Both worked fine.
Re: instagram profile field
Reply #11 –
Did you mean as an upload alternatif? That could be tougher i suppose. So far that I remember when I was using FB, they still use camera for direct upload like that and no screenshot can be loaded to it directly without using upload or camera.
I guess sceditor work only for clipboard image "with url" as it can immediately be translated as img bbc tag. Without it, it cannot link to it and display it as it is not yet uploaded and have a proper url link. May be sceditor is not for uploading image but only for loading and displaying it when it is already availabe?