Re: buglet/feature footnotes [was: Re: On the release cycle]
Reply #3 –
I've had more time to think about it. I think the best solution and easiest to code would be to allow the footnote marker in the quote, but do not show the footnote definition in the quoted post. The footnote marker still links to the original footnote definition, and I think that will suffice.
Just my opinion.
Re: buglet/feature footnotes [was: Re: On the release cycle]
Reply #5 –
If I personally had to choose between having it and not having it in quotes, I'd rather not. Just my personal preferences. Or perhaps and option to turn it on/off in quotes would make everyone happy?
Re: buglet/feature footnotes [was: Re: On the release cycle]
Reply #6 –
It may look a bit confusing at first, though it make sense to have it there in my opinion.
Re: buglet/feature footnotes [was: Re: On the release cycle]
Reply #7 –
It made people easier to track the references, but some may find it cluttering the post.
Re: buglet/feature footnotes [was: Re: On the release cycle]
Reply #8 –
Showing footnotes inside quotes was Pete's final suggestion before he left Wedge. I implemented it in about 10 minutes but maybe my architecture is geared towards doing that kind of stuff, I don't know. I'd recommend doing it, too.