Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Why not use SimplePortal? Started by emanuele · · Read 18863 times 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. previous topic - next topic

Why not use SimplePortal?

Since we have it, I wonder if it is not easier to use it instead of the custom home page.
@Spuds do you think replicate the structure would be difficult?
Worst case we build new features into SP to have what we need, no? O:-)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #1 –

Mmm, maybe people downloading the software think that the portal is coming by default?

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #2 –

Perhaps, but is that really any different with the current custom mini-portal?

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #3 –

Well, we started using the page just because there was no portal available. O:-)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #4 –

at least they can see in action the power of SP ;) I like the idea
sorry for my bad english

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #5 –

Show me the portal!!!

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #6 –

This is the only portal I know. ;)

LiveGallery - Simple gallery addon for ElkArte

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #7 –

xD
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #8 –

Quote from: ahrasis – Show me the portal!!!
I think this, that or a link to a demo site is meant.  ;D
▬|████|▬ This is a Nudelholz! Take it und hau it on the Kopp of a bekloppt Person .... to give you a better Gefühl than vorher.

ElkArte 1.1.x & TP on Apache2.4.48, PHP 8.0.8 FPM

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #9 –

Just to clarify: we talk about the use of the portal for version 1.1?
▬|████|▬ This is a Nudelholz! Take it und hau it on the Kopp of a bekloppt Person .... to give you a better Gefühl than vorher.

ElkArte 1.1.x & TP on Apache2.4.48, PHP 8.0.8 FPM

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #10 –

Yep. :)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #11 –

I hope to see sometime a portal software in which the width of the columns is not limited to pixels or percent.  ;D
▬|████|▬ This is a Nudelholz! Take it und hau it on the Kopp of a bekloppt Person .... to give you a better Gefühl than vorher.

ElkArte 1.1.x & TP on Apache2.4.48, PHP 8.0.8 FPM
 

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #12 –

If you use CSS it's limited to whatever you want it to be. :P
And using !important you can override even inline styles. ;)
Bugs creator.
Features destroyer.
Template killer.

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #13 –

Quote from: emanuele – If you use CSS it's limited to whatever you want it to be. :P
And using !important you can override even inline styles. ;)
I know that already. But why a two-way system, if you can handle unnecessary entries in the css file?
▬|████|▬ This is a Nudelholz! Take it und hau it on the Kopp of a bekloppt Person .... to give you a better Gefühl than vorher.

ElkArte 1.1.x & TP on Apache2.4.48, PHP 8.0.8 FPM

Re: Why not use SimplePortal?

Reply #14 –

Quote from: Mc Fly – I hope to see sometime a portal software in which the width of the columns is not limited to pixels or percent.  ;D

If you have time to fix it, send a PR to the Github repo. Or complain to @Spuds @[SiNaN] ;)