Re: Re: attachmentz
Reply #20 –
This should be the family, so the question is do any of them have a 600 weight font, or even a bold that render demi.
Right now of OSx the 600 weight should be calling Helvetica Neue Medium, maybe that needs to be bold with that face to be demi (fonts are weird). If not do any of the family provide a nice 600 semi-demi-almost-bold look?
Helvetica Neue
Helvetica Neue Bold
Helvetica Neue Italic
Helvetica Neue Bold Italic
Helvetica Neue Condensed Bold
Helvetica Neue UltraLight
Helvetica Neue UltraLight Italic
Helvetica Neue Light
Helvetica Neue Light Italic
Helvetica Neue Condensed Black
Helvetica Neue Medium
Helvetica Neue Medium Italic
Helvetica Neue Thin
Helvetica Neue Thin Italic
Any help is appreciated !
Re: Re: attachmentz
Reply #21 –
Sure. I have tried most of those but anything other than "Helvetica Neue" is not recognized at all. I think I have a fairly regular setup (OSX 10.8.5) and I'm using Chrome (32.0.1700.77). I'm not sure how it's supposed to look, so I'm attaching some screenshots. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help with this one.
Re: attachmentz
Reply #22 –
Thank you for those images, that does help.
It looks like the current one does have less "weight:" to the bold font, just not as much as what I see under windows.
Reading a bit on the web it appears that adding -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; to the demi declaration may help de-emphasize it a bit further so I may add that to the css to see if it helps.
Re: Re: attachmentz
Reply #23 –
Attached a screenshot with that one added. It looks better and might really be might you're after.
Re: attachmentz
Reply #24 –
That is looking better, thanks for testing, the change will be in the next update.
The idea was in select areas bold had to much visual punch, so a gentler one was wanted. That lead to the 600 weight being added some time ago with some known limitations in certain combinations. Over time we kept finding more combinations that did not work, seems that's always the way. Now I think we are back to having more, combinations work as expected.
Re: Re: attachmentz
Reply #26 –
You should avoid using die(). You should set the templates/layers to empty and then let the script finish executing. Also, maybe add some hooks in there? I can definitely see someone wanting to change where these attachments go and how they get processed. Just suggestions though, because if it works, add it.
Re: Re: attachmentz
Reply #28 –
That's the point - it's on your terms, not on the whole application's terms. There might be things that need to happen after that. Just saying it is generally regarded as not good programming practices.
I can see a want to have attachment uploads do something different when uploaded via AJAX. Maybe add a "integration" hook in there to allow pre and post processing. What if someone wants to change the result or make the data different.